Social valuation across multiple audiences: 
The interplay between ability and identity judgments

How is an evaluating audience influenced by previous evaluations made by another audience? We develop theory about how evaluators’ assessment is shaped by previous evaluations made by an external (non- peer) audience. We argue that the latter positively influence peer valuation by pointing to candidates’ unobservable abilities; yet, being conferred by an external audience, they are also indicative of candidates’ deviation from an expected peer identity. The two opposite effects suggest an inverted U-shaped relationship between exogenous indices and peer valuation. Further, this effect is moderated by the identity proximity between audiences, and the availability of previous peer evaluations (endogenous indices). We find support for our arguments using data on peer valuation of 9,502 scientists applying for research grants.


Should you want to attend this talk, please register by sending a message to Thinley Tharchen at: We will send you a copy of the paper and order a free sandwich for you (please mention any dietary preference).

Don’t miss Julien’s interview, by our fabulous PhDs

Interview: Laura Dupin, Muhammad Imran and Thinley Tharchen.
Camera and Editing: Thinley Tharchen.

Skip to toolbar